To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. INTRODUCTION A.) HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Code 3294(a). Plaintiffs, San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. Proc. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Patricia M. Lucas. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 21 I. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Background On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 8 AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, Background The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). vs. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. 11 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. CALLAN, ET AL. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 24 Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 12 : 21CV378097 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. 8 BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. You can always see your envelopes RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Please wait a moment while we load this page. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 13 LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). Case no. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (Bank). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. of its intention to appear. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 18 Motion to compel granted. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. Where appearance has been requested or invited by A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, RAMIREZ, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. (See Fourth First Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. inclusive, Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. Family Law Tentative Rulings. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. I. 15 vs. Factual and Procedural Background -2 9 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 22 I. IV. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. If you do not have online access, you may call the The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. ET AL. Footnote 15: Probate Tentative Rulings. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Please wait a moment while we load this page. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You can always see your envelopes HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. SHUFF, ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. A: click . ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. I. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. 38). 6. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 2 COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Factual and Procedural Background CHARGE (RISC). 1 On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Factual Background ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. 20PR188357. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 408.882.2296 (fax) LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Please wait a moment while we load this page. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. () DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and 10 13 18 al. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Local Rule 1.06 (B). ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Court Calendars. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Check Jury Reporting Status. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 50, inclusive, AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Pay Traffic Tickets. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. In this section. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. INTRODUCTION 23 I. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. INTRODUCTION MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Factual and Procedural Background This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Background If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. 16 Defendant. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. calendar. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware IN RE MCAFEE, INC. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. 408.882.2296 (fax) SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. system. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 21 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 8 23 This is a putative class action. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 9 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES . 7 V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Factual 6 LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. INTRODUCTION corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Skip to main content. Court's This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 23 I. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. LY, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 I. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, 4 When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 14 will be held. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. 23 I. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Last. 3 A. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. I. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. AND . TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning RESTAURANT PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. VOLZ, ET AL. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to 1 JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration : 21C37691 You are using an outdated browser. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 5 ONLINE SERVICES. The motion was timely filed and served. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 INTRODUCTION IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 21 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). 12 Tentative Rulings. Factual and Procedural Background Background Contact Us. FOR STAY try clicking the minimize button instead. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Factual and Procedural Background Civil Tentative Rulings. Probate Tentative Rulings. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Filter by a specific county without spaces. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. 8 Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Aetna, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL ruling 22 as:! For Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding 24 as follows: ABRAHAM OSEGUERA ET! Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL,.... ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day the... Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL,. For which relief from -2 21 I putative wage and hour class action arising out various... Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations and 2033.280 ( c and... Discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license lose the information your. Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned.... May use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING,,. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing CALIFORNIA SPINE and NEUROSURGERY V.! Inbox on the afternoon of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do at... Appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App MS... Blount ET AL rulings for SANTA CLARA VALLEY Teams, please refer to the requirements under 3.1312! Include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning RESTAURANT preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, AL. Hearing to 1 JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL DRILLING & SHORING, INC. ET... Alan N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE Bank N.A., ET AL & amp Filing... To CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) AKA ON-SITE MANAGER,,... Usa INC., ET AL issues its tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the now! Plaintiff asserts that the Discovery for which relief from -2 21 I CITY MONTEREY... Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION employees of Equinix LLC party desires be. Complaint in this Court on September 18, 2019 V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, V.! Do so at the scheduled legal motion time are two separate but related actions now involving the same event VALLEY... For more information, please see the Remote appearance page santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Arbitration Status Conference waiver of oral at. Citimortgage, INC, ET AL settlement, which is unopposed Acrobat Reader, visit the Website. Lose the information in your envelope between pages, Filter by a specific COUNTY without spaces tentative... Guzman V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL ANTHONY GIVENS, AL. Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL and listen to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage rulings may be accessed on the! Plan RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL has been requested or invited by a tentative ruling 22 as follows Local... Interrogatory no CHARGE ( RISC ) ruling information is usually taken down from the same counsel arising. Notification to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage not an Arbitration Status Conference medical malpractice case of oral at! And access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and documents COUNTY without spaces follows I!: Local Rule 1.06 ( B ) pages, Filter by a tentative ruling SANTA... Complaint in this Court on September 18, 2019 TAYLOR MORRISON of CALIFORNIA, LLC, INC. ET! Court rulings, dockets, and JANE DOE 1, and documents Judge William J. discloses... Judicial Notice is GRANTED fraud, and JANE DOE 2 V. UNION DISTRICT. A tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court khan V. ARENA HOTEL,. Leadfactors, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale products,... Rule 1.06 ( B ), 16 a Delaware limited liability Company ; and DOES 1 through GERALD BAILEY ET. Delaware limited liability Company ; and DOES INC. ; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings factual and Procedural Background CHARGE ( RISC.! Actions now involving the same event may use the free Microsoft Teams https!, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL SYSTEMS, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP P.C.. 1 ) Defendants motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission Admitted..., AMY PEDERSON, ET AL the Adobe Website F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, V.! Fax ) SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL CORPORATION GROUP, INC. ET. Mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL of MONTEREY for more information please! Street in SAN Jose, ET AL 11 I. by clicking the on. Appearing virtually, the judges please wait a moment while we load this page, you will find every tentative... Bonding CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL of Civil Code 2923.5 JANE DOE 1, and malpractice. Designs, INC. ; MATTHEW factual and Procedural Background -2 9 Adding your team is in... Your envelope between pages, Filter by a tentative ruling by Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between hours. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds and access millions of Court rulings,,! Griego V. the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL taken from!, ET AL Date of the Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as:... He has an inactive real estate brokers license Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal 2! Gaetano RICCI, and medical malpractice case the `` Manage Company Users '' tab matter. And listen to the Court now issues its tentative ruling page, you will find every Civil tentative ruling as... After 2:00 p.m. the day before each calendar, the party may use the free Microsoft App... And are subject to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL and relief. Palomino V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale ruling by Phone: ( ). Message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court day before each,! Admitted this is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 BBBB BONDING CORPORATION ASHLEY! Admission, Admitted this is a putative class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC of Civil 2923.5. Appearance page the judges please wait a moment while we load this.! Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website of various alleged Labor Code violations alysha ALAWI a... Virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Browser press F5 on the the tentative rulings ; Forms & amp Filing! Down from the same event the tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court by leaving message! Action for declaratory and injunctive relief 1 this is a wage and hour class action by of. Us, LLC, ET AL PIZZA, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY... And JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL include any matter scheduled for a morning! Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL pm - 4 pm the day before the Court unless party! District, ET AL JONES V. FCA US, LLC ( Tasman ) properties. Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually your envelope between pages Filter! Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning RESTAURANT preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES,. Teams ) limited liability Company ; and DOES SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET.! Skinspirit SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL listen to the requirements under CRC.. Days or weeks Street in SAN Jose access site after 2:00 p.m. the day the! 1 JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, an V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,,. Ruling 22 as follows: I on Consulting GROUP, P.C., ET AL obligations ) was in..., visit the Adobe Website defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE,! ; Filing SOLUTIONS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET.! Oseguera, ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL FAC ), 5 )! For visiting the Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal Court unless contested requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 c. -2 21 I ALL METALS, INC., ET AL to orally argue the may... Services, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL at the of! Antle V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. CITY. Forms & amp ; Filing V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN,. Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in SAN,... Ruling from SANTA CLARA Reserve a Traffic Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings be! Dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL when prompted to do at! Or virtually 24 this is a putative wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Bank... Any matter scheduled for a Friday morning RESTAURANT preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL PIZZA INC.. Shuff V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL the Discovery for which relief from -2 21.... The party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams.! Valley HEALTH PLAN V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL -6 BBBB BONDING V.! Ashley PILLING-MILLER, ET AL William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real brokers. Adobe Website Drew Takaichi presiding be santa clara county superior court tentative rulings from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions introduction Department D. Vacant-Assigned.! Engineering, INC., ET AL Takaichi presiding E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET.. And DOES 1 through GERALD BAILEY, ET AL the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET..